Proposal For Rebuilding Twin Towers
Published on February 18, 2004 By GemCityJoe In Current Events

OLD WORLD TRADE CENTER
DESTROYED SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

Many are upset with new ideas for the rebuilding of the New World Trade Center complex. A new and seemingly popular proposal has the new tallest highrise some 70 stories high with the configuration of steel trusses crisscrossing every which way and a huge needle stuck up on top.

Is this what we really want to replace such a well known and beloved American land mark that was knocked down by a bunch of foreign thugs and terrorists? What if would have been the Golden Gate Bridge or the Statue of Liberty? What would we have built in their places? As Americans, I don't think that we would have setteled for anything less than having them replaced with structures that are as much like the original ones as possible. Does the World Trade Center deserve anything less? These buildings were national landmarks as well. Do we just chalk them off as old relics of the past and forget they ever existed? Is that the American spirit?

Now some will say well, people don't feel safe anymore in buildings that tall. Do they actually feel any safer in a building that is 70 stories high as opposed to one that is 112? People are just as vulnerable in buildings that are 50 or 70 floors than they are in one that is 100 or more.

I say we should restore the World Trade Center only make it bigger and better so that future generations may know their splendor. Others are feeling the same way. How do you feel?

See additional photos and find out more information about restoring the World Trade Center and making it grander than ever before and safer too with new modern technology. Click onto the link below.



NEW WORLD TRADE CENTER MEMORIAL
INHANCED WITH OLD TRADE CENTER'S DESIGN



WEST ELEVATION OF NEWLY PROPOSED
112 STORY WORLD TRADE CENTER

Comments
on Feb 18, 2004
I also think they should be as close to the originals as they can be... those buildings were beautiful, a work of art.. and funny how me don't appreciate something until its gone.. My family and I live in Florida, therefore we only heard of the planes crashing through tv stations.. that day I went and picked up my daughter early form schol, then drove to pick my husband up from work (he's a union ironworker, local 272).. A few weeks later he went to New york, since so many ironworkers were at the sight of the twin towers, they were not abloe to work on regular jobs.. so ironworkers form out of state, called boomers, came and did those jobs.. My husband saw pieces of the world trade center being taken away, and managed to get a piece from the big needle, looks like a light socket or something.. I have great respect and admiration for those planning and designing the buildings, but even more so for those brave union ironworkers who will go there to build these monuments..
on Feb 18, 2004
where as much like the original ones as possible.


Hopefully just outsides... There was few flaws that helped building burn down that much faster. Something about the fireproofing foam on frames being blown off by impact, which gave fire access to metal beams.
on Feb 18, 2004
From what I understand, the new structures are going to be very much upgraded with fire proofing form that of the last buildings and the stair cases are to be enveloped in two tubes with censors that warn people if the stairs are impassable. GCJ
on Feb 18, 2004
g'day GCJ!!!!!

where you been?
on Feb 18, 2004
Personally, I think one of things that makes America great is our principle of constant innovation. Remember the past, but ALWAYS look forward.

Nostalgia aside, these buildings were not only an architectural eye-sore, but a relic of an older area where building bigger and higher was thought of as the pinnacle of urban development.

We can do much better.

My 02
on Feb 19, 2004
Poet you are exactly right and I am saying the same thing. Though the buildings may eye sores to you. Others don't see them as such though they did take some getting use to at first, people came to love them. The new buildings proposed are not clones of the old towers. They are different in design and will be constructed with newer modern technology. They will be greatly improved in technology and in looks.
Now I don't know where you've been, but the age of building bigger and better is in no way a relic of the past. Just look around you. GCJ
on Feb 19, 2004
G'day to you Muggaz. I took a little vacation but I'm back now. Why did you miss me? GCJ
on Feb 19, 2004
of course mate, your comical antics are always welcomed!

BAM!!!
on Feb 19, 2004
I think that the new World Trade Center towers should look a lot like the original towers and be taller too to show those terrorist thugs that we are not afraid to build and work in tall buildings. To build shorter buildings would be a sign of weakness.
on Feb 20, 2004
Well said Tech Cat. GCJ
on Feb 20, 2004
I am not an expert, and perhaps someone else can chime in, but when it comes to modern urban space planning, aren't skyscrapers now considered inefficient - a misguided approach?

Sure they look cool - hey maybe we could build them out of gold, like Mandalay Bay in Vegas? 120 stories of gold. You think we're weak, think again, we make buildings out of GOLD. In your face sucka!
on Feb 22, 2004
I understand that some of the interiors of buildings in Moscow are actually lined in gold. They tend to spare no expense in their building as they don't believe in the here after or the mansions to come. GCJ